If they want autonomy they must request the Venetian language.

I reread and rewrite an article in 2006, written when Galan still ruled Veneto.

I read from a newspaper (of the 2006) that “in the nearby Friulian environments to the request for specialties that comes forward from Veneto” yes object that "”Veneto cannot camp minorities to be protected to request a specialty as a region, Just as it has no delicate border situations ". There is talk of linguistic minorities.

Not enough Illy Trieste and Friuli and many politicians have reminded Galan as the special statute regions exist since the birth of the Italian Republic for specific geographical reasons – Sardinia and Sicily are two islands – and because on their territories there are consistent linguistic minorities.

This Illy ago 2 bad impression, because the FVG region was established by Law Cost. no.1 1963, 25 years after the Republic, and the Venetians are a people recognized by art.2 L.N.340/1971. But we can not blame Illy this second thing, since he seemed to ignore her or not even wanting her Galan that all of Trentino wanted us.
Illy added that "to allow adequate protection to these minorities and adequate coexistence have been established the specialties and in the face of greater resources correspond, in our case, Certainly greater charges ".

Contrary to the concept of “Venetian” also the mayor of Udine, Historically Venetian land if even in its specificity.

All these gentlemen seem to forget that their region is called "Friuli-Venezia-Giulia", where "Venice" is actually 80% of the territory, and where the Friuli (OTHER 15%) has always been Veneto. I add in the 2020 that most residents speak Veneto and not Friuli.

Those politicians, Together with the unfortunate (then) Galan seem to compete to erase the history of the Venetians, I did not dare to think that those thoughts were the fruit of ignorance or the product to govern on behalf of the Italians that Venetian history does not want it in school books.

But how do you forget 400 years in which the Friulians were Venetian in the Veneto state? How do you forget the common destiny of Lombardy and Veneto, which was illegally occupied by the Savoy in violation of international treaties, and that cost him a fratricidal war between Venetian and Veneto on the banks of the Piave?

However, the thought of the then mayor of Udine is interesting, who confirmed that “not only a municipality must decide to change the region, But this must be accepted by the destination region ", which will never happen, because from what world it is world, the privileged difficult to share their privileges. in fact, in 2020, Remote 14 years, The referendums of the Venetian municipalities to move on to the province of Trento have remained unheeded.

I must also give credit to Mirko Spacan, Representative of the Slovenian minority or slo-Venetian (they say the Slovenes), that “to change the region a matter of economic interests is wrong. Friuli Venezia Giulia is a region with minorities, primarily Slovenian, should be valued even better to encourage dialogue with neighboring states. The same bilingualism is a wealth of this land. Reasoning instead as does the Veneto, I think a simple thought in economics “short”, reductive ".
He is right as he puts the emphasis on the speech of bilingualism, of the identity that motivates and justifies autonomy.

Ad iLilly who denied the existence of the Venetian language Galan should have remembered that there is a linguistic minority in Veneto, Venetian language, which is a language . Istat tells us that the 66% of Venetian Venetian speaks at home as at work, with friends like on occasions of public meeting.

Note: in 2016 The National Venetian minority was recognized by the Veneto Region but the law was made to cancel in 2018 by the Constitutional Court precisely by the will of a Friulian, it prof. Police, On the mandate of the council Zaia.

That the Venetian minority is not recognized by the Italian state, which has more willingly recognized the Albanian and Serbian minorities of the South, just shows the true nature of the relationship between Veneto and Italy: occupation and exploitation.

But the concept is clear: nothing autonomy without the Venetian language.

The following year in fact an attempt by Galan to have the’ autonomy through the language has been done. Through the regional recognition of the Venetian language, proposals for recognition of the Venetian language actually arrived from the province of Vicenza and the province of Treviso, but then everything remained dead letter because the state never ratified, as it should, The European Charter for regional and minority languages.

until the 2020 Raening the language and specialty identity also in order to have autonomy is not a way that has been traveled by Zaia, who does not make more than a few of a few lines. in 2017 There was also the referendum for autonomy, But the Italian Parliament did not recognize autonomy to the Venetians, and if it will do it will not correspond to anything good, Because less money in Rome would be a financial Karakiri for Italy.

Galan asked the regional council for the recognition of the Venetian language, those on the left also proved to be later and at the time of my law in 2016 Just like illy,. However, they never began to reason on the basis of the concept of "linguistic minority" of the Constitution and how to claim its specificity.

no recognition of the Venetian language of autonomy claims are just propaganda exercise. And I would like to curb enthusiasm: Even with the language recognized, autonomy will not come or the state will collapse in the. The Venetians would do better to add to their status of servants. You could also say “You are Italian? Pay!”
Expecting regional institutions to move in this sense and they can really do something is an illusion, because already in 2000 I receive a formal request for recognition of the administration of "Autogoverno del Popolo Veneto" even foreseen by the Statute of the Region (art.2). Galan knew why I personally spoke twice (But one of the time it seemed bright to me).

Perhaps the language and the Venetian identity have always been exploited to take away the votes to some other authentic autonomist, or to unleash a debate where everyone says “The Venetians are not a minority, not a people, They do not have a language, even the Trentino and the Friuli want them …..”.

Perhaps the true purpose of the debate on the tongue is only to spread a curtain of smoke on what is really mounting in the censorship of the media, that is, the concrete exercise of the self -government of the Venetian people.

E’ only a matter of time. There will be criminal consequences for the’ omission, Because legally the Italian official is obliged to pass the reins of the administration to the self -government of the Veneto people, he says the law n.881 / 1977. Galan did not do it since 2000, as we have seen he had too many skeletons in the closet to be able to do it.
I said precisely “who do not want or do not know how to do, Galan is certainly not the man who will bring home something, He only knows how to get confused for his reasons.” . The same I say of Zaia for years.