the Lombardy-Venetia state ready for the international cause for the return of independence

Few know that Lombardy has never legally voted to become Italian.

E’ true that in 1848, after the armies of France and Sardinia-Piedmont had won Austria and conquered part of Lombardy-Venetia, A "Lombard State" was made and a fake plebiscite was organized to sanction the annexation to Sardinia-Piedmont. However, the following year the Lombard state was canceled and it was recognized that it was all null: returning the Lombardo-Veneto in one piece.

Only in 1859 Sardinia-Piedmont he regained the "Lombardy" region of Lombardo-Veneto but a plebiscite for the validation of the annexation never did, even when in 1860 They did in most of the peninsula: They were notoriously rigged plebiscites, made with great fraud, threats to the patriots, Scams organized by the Sardinian-Piedmontese government that became "Kingdom of Italy", but these bogus plebiscites internationally had become mandatory, By virtue of the right to self -government of peoples, they were indispensable for Italy to acquire the right to hold the territory. Italy, brazenly, Instead, he did not respect the law of the Lombards!

In that 1866 the kingdom of Italy did not have much interest in respecting the treaties (even now) and he had just betrayed treaties with Prussia , betrayal through Quela managed to obtain Veneto from Austria but he crossed a blackmail ( Italy had in fact shamefully lost militarily defeat in Custoza and in the naval battle of Lissa ). He said to Austria: I betray Prussia if you give me the same Veneto. Austria refused, but granted to pass the Veneto to France which would manage the annexation of the entire Lombardy-Veneto region through a plebiscite. He discussed the fact internationally possession of Lombardy: the powers recognized that Italy , despite the military possession of Lombardy from 1859 Al 1866, he did not have legal possession, In short, the so -called "utte posseditis" was denied him, and in the transfer treaty it was written that the entire Lombardy-Veneto region was ceded. Lombardy, too, should therefore have voted for annexation.

The political representation of the entire Lombardy-Veneto had been assigned by the Treaties to the Venetians because the political capital of that state was Venice, This by virtue of the fact that the Lombard-Veneto was nothing more than the successor of the Republic of Venice with the Lombard territories merged. This was, heir to the Republic of Venice, It was recognized as such by the Congress of Vienna 1814 that made the restoration, But then it was not thought of peoples because the states belonged to the kings, the people did not count legally. At the congress it was equally clear that "Lombardy" was in fact only an administrative division of Austria, which, the Government of the Republic of Venice, and divided them into many pieces, and granted the secularly Venetian lands of Bergamo and Brescia to the land historically and properly Lombardy.

The Vienna International Treaty 3 October 1866 therefore he had the vote all over the Lombardo-Veneto, But Italy did not accept this principle, He did not think of the "Lombardy" in the least, which then as now understood about 60% resident population. in conclusion, the plebiscite that was organized in the Veneto (that until after World War II also included Udine and Pordenone) He could not have the legal effect of recognition of the annexation of Lombardy and Veneto, as it immediately excluded from the vote 60% of eligible voters.

worse: the same electoral law was fatt by a handful of the Italian Government puppets.

Italy only thought of cheating on the Venetians (and Lombard) and in international negotiations he replaced them from a "puppet" government of the Italian government. come ? Through a secret committee he made those who professed for independence and those who wanted to represent the Venetians by themselves to return to the Republic of San Marco as in death as in the 1848 (The Italian commissioner who managed everything speaks in his book of memories, Thaon Revel .

Had the control of the Venetian provisional government representative of the Lombardo-Veneto, It was the Italian Government to decide who could vote: excluded the female population (in Tuscany they had already voted in the 1848), and he gave voting rights only to wealthy males whom he had promised other great fortunes. To feel comfortable the Italian government gave the franchise its soldiers, so much so that in many seats there were more votes than those entitled!

So even vote, where he voted, it was all a fraud, death threats, open vote, but not only: the same government that was organizing was fake and illegal under international law, and the outcome of the vote (99% favor) of the annexation of Lombardo-Veneto is absolutely not binding because Lombardy did not vote in violation of the treaty.

These facts about the invalidity of the vote on the international level (and Italian interior) they were mostly clarified by Loris Palmerini in 2006, which made the self-government of the Venetian people become (born in 1999 on its thrust) the legal representative of the Lombardo-Veneto going to the territories of the government as it should be in 1866. Since then (2006) The question was brought to the courts, inducing the judge of Venice to declare the "absolute defect of jurisdiction". Unfortunately, one had to start bringing the question before the judges in the 2009 Since a previous cause in the Council of Europe has been lost by ineptitude of the representative who did not apply the lawyer in time. The fact is that in December 2010 the Italian state also canceled the annexation of Lombardy-Veneto.

Legally Lombard-Veneto is therefore not an Italian territory, it is a sovereign state, but his people, held in censorship and militarily occupied, He knows nothing, He is pushed to recognize the Italian state and his judges who instead cannot be legally valid because they do not impartial by definition. The Lombardy-Veneto region is squeezed to keep the rest of Italy. or better, the regime apparatus.

Yet it can return quickly, with little effort.

THE 5 July 2012 and Venetian Self-Government Institutions (Legal heirs) They have constituted the federal institutions of Lombardo-Veneto, in view of the presentation of the international cause for the liberation of the Lombardo-Veneto was by the Italian Government since the invader 1859-1866

Lombard-Veneto is now a federal state with 3 nations (Lombardi, Venetians and Mantovani) which each have their own self-government (an elective Assembly, a national government, a Court, the Autonomous Province), coming together in a Federal Senate studied on the model of the Venetian Republic. The Senate and the government are in fact made by local authorities, but also by senior officials, judges and a percentage (15%) citizens capable and deserving.

They are also recognized several minority languages ​​and the mechanisms for the recognition of other internationally that have not been classified, but that there.

The Government has now started collecting funds for international lawsuit.

It is estimated that there is sufficient 1 million euros to introduce the cause, including the necessary propaganda preparation of the population and international organizations.

One million euros is a ridiculous figure to reach independence, all the more for Lombardo-Veneto. Once the international cause will be presented, independence in 2 years or so.

Lombardo-Veneto will not take Italian debts with him, Unlike, will request the return of the taxes illegally taken and compensation for the damage suffered for illegal employment.

The Lombardo-Veneto with just 16 about millions of citizens will become the 4 economic power of Europe, the 8 OF THE WORLD.

The Lombard-Veneto once in self-government will carry out a plebiscite that meets the international requirement, And the right of secession of Lombardi and Mantovani has already been guaranteed .

E’ recognition has already been requested to several states, but we are only at the beginning.

Those who think of achieving the independence of Lombardy, Veneto and Friuli-Venezia, reflect well on the benefits of the path of international law:

The Italian state not by any legal possibility of making a referendum for independence

however a referendum, since the territory is legally sovereign, It would not be legally valid compared to Lombard-Veneta sovereignty

The Italian state will never recognize the autonomy of Veneti and Lombardi, indeed it is taking it away from those who have it: It is impossible that it will be positively reformed

Each political or referendum path will require at least 20 years

International law does not recognize the unilateral referendum founding of a territory (as in the case of Kosovo)

In international law, cases such as Lombardy-Veneto have already been regulated, They have precedents, So if the sovereignty was denying, a new principle of law would be affirmed for which the military occupation of a state is legal (as Italy did): this would trigger World War III with the invasion of China, russia, America and other large territories.

The proconsuls of the territories, representatives of the Venetians, Lombardi and Mantovani, the economic and social forces, come forward for the recovery of sovereignty.

Those who hinder or attempt to divert the inevitable process of liberation will suffer the economic or criminal sanctions provided for by our laws.

Loris Palmerini

President pro tempore of the Government of Lombardy and Veneto

www.Lombardo-Veneto.net