The Venetie courts will soon be directly managed by the Veneto people, and will be bilingual in all the provinces of Veneto, that is, including those of Bergamo, Brescia and Cremona.
This is the result of a series of actions that wanted to be obtained with actions rising to the chronicles of courier, Gazzettino, the morning of Padua.
In reality it was not anything new, If anything, the only novelty is the fact that a study of normal lawyers presented the request.
But on the other hand, lawyers take care of the client's interests, and if the laws allow this, and they are international laws, Here the action becomes of constitutional and international scope.
These rights in fact derive from the demonstration that the Lombardy-Veneto region in the 1866 has been invaded and is not legally Italian, demonstration that I did in 2006 and written in the book “The Republic unborn” of the 2007.
Legally Lombard-Veneto is not Italy. So also in Milan, Lecco, As, Pavia, Sondrio and Varese will have their own courts, but in Lombard language. In Mantua the Mantovano.
Not only, I have shown in the same booklet that the Referendum of the 1946 it is not legally valid, is null, since they did not vote for Italian citizens of Istria, Dalmatia, as well as those of Udine, Pordenone, Belluno, Bolzano and others.
On these issues, the Venice Court questioned in 2006 he pronounced in 2008, and ruled that on “Lombardo-Veneto” there is the “ABSOLUTE FAILURE OF JURISDICTION”, exactly like for the American bases.
For non-employe, this means that Lombardy-Veneto is not a territory that the Italian government can demand as its own, and that Justice must be indigenous and managed by the locals, because it establishes the international law.
In fact, how the judge of an abusive administration can be impartial from the beginning ?
In short, it is only out of ignorance of their rights that the citizens of the Venetias pay taxes in Rome and manage by the Italian administration.
Especially since the administration is legally already in the hands of the Venetians also according to a device of Italian laws that in fact provide for their self -government. The laws in fact I have foreseen since 1971 that the “people Venetian” exists and has the right to “self-government”, ie the right to detention at 100% of taxes in the Venetie, as they do in Bolzano, Aosta and Palermo. MA “self-government” It is also that of justice, especially since the Venetian language is internationally recognized and the Italians do not recognize it.
In any case, international laws prevail over those of Rome, and international laws recognize every people the right to their own institutions.
That's why we Venetians, from 1999, instead we used international laws, with which, being sovereign people, we have set up our institutions, a registry office, a government, a parliament, a Tribunal. The citizens of the Venetias registered in the registry of the Venetian people, they can ask to be tried by a judge “natural” ( Dall’art.6 L.N.848/1955).
Already in 2003 First attempts were made to assert these rights, but sometimes in the incorrect form, sometimes finding subversive judges who violated the law, sometimes we miss the money to pay lawyers , We, among the most productive people in Europe, we are out of money.
And they certainly helped slow these actions down, and to make us lack popular support, all those political forces that carry federalism forward, Autonomy and independence with phantasmagoric referendums of various types.
But why ask Rome what is already written in the laws?
|
 |
in conclusion, The people of the Venetias want self -government, including immigrants who would have the highest salary.
But the main cause of the non -achievement of self -government are precisely those Venetians who do not know how to make a structure and coalize around the only possible way and already started, that of direct self -government.
Who denies the right to immediate self-government, or it is an incapable, or it is in bad faith, eager for personal power at the cost of curbing the process of self-government and self-determination in compliance with international and Venetian laws.
However , The china is exceeded.
It is no longer a matter of “He” there will be the Venetian courts , but only of “When”.
Certainly a magistrate could also deny these rights, all the more and it has already done it in the past.
But who can say if between 1, The 2 years, o from 5 The 10 years , A Veneto sovereign court will call him to answer his crimes.
Because denying these rights is a crime, a violation of the Italian Constitution and international laws, with very serious penalties.
And the laws are the same for everyone, all the more for the magistrates who must apply them.
De Pieri is one of the first Venetian citizens asking for respect for these rights. His right to the impartial judge is intangible, protected by a string of laws and the Constitution, And this is the court of the Venetian people, who has their own magistrates, and impartial popular juries.
They will decide if De Pieri is guilty and what. It is not for me or the Italian judges to judge him for his behavior.
I myself asked the same things in 2008, but they never answered me, rather they have frozen everything. Then this year I asked Strasbourg to condemn Italy because he hasn't answered me yet. De Pieri will do the same between 6 months.
If justice were to respond negatively to these rights, Strasbourg will be asked to condemn her because it denies these rights!
In fact we are already a sovereign state, and the Italian government is helpless compared to this, it can only be silent and hope that awareness of the Venetians does not grow.
What is certain is that those who invoke these rights have seen the judicial proceedings that concerned them disappear over the years, and everything goes in prescription.
De Pieri himself saw a sentence at first instance vanish that went in prescription because the jurisdiction was asked.
|
 Article on the morning of Padua in 6 October 2009
|
