The hoax on me that propagates from the site antibufale: fake “antifake news” ?

Accusing me of impropriety for my article entitled “WE WON, This hoax with variations in the past!“, The site Butac invented a hoax, or at least an inference and a tarnished reputation.

This hoax with variations in the past. Let's see what he says.

The author does not include real name and surname, as in all the fake news, and my company maicolengel@butac.it.

It Supports Maicolengel I extrapolated from the circular of’ Order of the doctors of Rome which I quoted a concept incorrect or non-existent.

And at one point he says “Nowhere in the decree states that the parents should not be informed“.

And here maicolengel@butac.it shows that you have not really understood the question.

In fact, the “law” Lorenzin does not at all require the signing of an informed consent to the parents who have to vaccinate or to the adult who is vaccinated. And in fact the circular of the doctors of Rome reported that I was leaving from this problem raised by doctors: “How should the doctor behave if the parents or whoever has parental authority of a minor refuse to sign the informed consent, on the grounds that being obliged by law they do not intend to give their consent?” It shows the circular.

The order says: “the compulsory nature of vaccination does not appear as any derogation from the principle that the doctor must obtain consent before proceeding with vaccination, after excluding that there may be impediments to vaccination circumstances and after having duly informed. No vaccinations, therefore, without parental consent.“

What is “consent” ? As stated in the application, the “Company” is the expression of the Consent, and the circular of the doctors said that such informed consent (and signed!) there must be, Otherwise, “A medical act in place in absence of consent can integrate a civil offense, criminal and ethics.“

In fact, the “informed consent” is mandatory for the “Oviedo Convention” imposing it:

Article 5 - General rule

An intervention in the field of health cannot be carried out until after the person concerned has given free and informed consent.

This person first of all receives adequate information on the purpose and nature of the intervention and its consequences and risks.

From this simple fact the’ Order of the doctors in question shows that the medical processing without obtaining prior informed consent acts unlawfully. It must ask “consent” otherwise it cannot proceed , textual “No vaccinations, therefore, without parental consent“

Thing ? So the doctor who does what he says “law” Lorenzin (which does not provide “informed consent” and signed ) ago illicit ?

E’ on the other hand it is obvious that one “compulsory vaccination” does not provide “informed consent”, because the concept of “obligatory” cannot predict a “consent” . and then it is not clear that the provision is unconstitutional and illegal for the Oviedo Convention ?

therefore, it is evident and I repeat it, the vaccination obligation is illegal e “WILL '” DELETED.

But we add a piece to those who do not know much of the story as maicolengel@butac.it , but mock those who put us to understand his.

The fact is that the Primacy of the human being : The interest and the good of the human being must prevail over the sole interest of society or science.

Who says that ? E’ verbatim Article 2 of “Oviedo Convention”

In other words, not only is the obligation illegal because there is informed consent (to be signed) it is to “law” Lorenzin obviously does not have it, but the very concept of “compulsory vaccination” For the “supreme” “interest of the company”, Why “The interest and the good of the human being must prevail over the sole interest of society or science.“

So how can we doubt that the obligation will be canceled ? It was enough to deepen before commenting, Michelangelo.

On the other hand, Butac went straight into a very delicate and bioethical question, involving our children's lives and our future.

As I am saying immediately after the approval of the “law” Lorenzin, if the vaccination obligation is not canceled by the Constitutional Court will in the face of blatant violation of several fundamental human rights. And since these human rights (and many others) and they are protected by art.2,10 32 the Constitution, here is that if the vaccination obligation is not canceled we will be faced with the overt dictatorship and the subversion of the Constitution, a dictatorship that is already carrying out the inoculation of unknown substances by force in its citizens, also metallic and nano particles. I say unknown because in the civilian there are not even microscopes to see what these aluminum agglomerating nanoparticles and others that are injected with vaccines are and what they do.. And this is a fact. But it must be added that we are already in the era where they are publicly realized nano-machines and nano-switches, let alone in the secret military laboratories.

In short, with the force inoculation of vaccines for a non-existent health emergency we could instead already be faced with the injection of something else, and if we hope this is not actually happening now, there is the certainty that soon this incoming risk could happen. The mandatory vaccination could be the door opener and then switch to the justified nanochip with some emergency “collective security”, or even justified and actually entered, perhaps with the excuse of terrorism to crack down “trafficking”, just as for terrorism in the USA the freedom of citizens and correspondence has been entered and violated and we do not know what else.

They are scenarios, let's face it, frightening, which I do not say are already the present, I do not have news of it, but the reality is that we don't know and we don't even have the means to verify, we did not like civilians microscopes necessary to do so. But I would really like to know why there is this nanoparticle aluminum that does so badly (obviously It is proven by science and brought to my website) and many more “tool” within this miraculous vaccines that absolutely do not hurt when we know it's not true.

Already the fact that Burioni and others say these lies about the perfect safety of vaccines, which are false corporate communications due to removal from the register pursuant to the Oviedo Convention, should scare the reader.

This should ask butac: how do they happen these things ?  How can they say these bales? How come the very great risks of vaccines is sottobvalutano? What is the real buffalo ?

Butac instead of attacking those who show people their human rights and the way to exercise them (as the appeal in the Constitutional Court that I presented 3 August 2017, then followed by others).

But the reality is that if we let vaccinations be illegally imposed (that can not be mandatory except in the case of true health catastrophe) in reality we give permission to a possible dictatorship (which perhaps is actually already evident now) to be able to control the population and destroy it with just one click activation may arise when, just with some hidden function of the future nanochip. But probably even earlier it will be technically possible for the dictatorship to eliminate the few dissidents still capable of awakening consciences recoglionite from TV , activating in dissident diseases triggered by nanochip in their body thanks to vaccinations.

Obviously if I am here to send it again this does not happen. But it is conceivable that it will soon be possible?

Impossible? The reality is that officially the technology is almost already there, but we do not know at what stage of development are the military, as mentioned in the civil level we have not even microscopes to see what these “agglomerations”.

Those butac and those who I ran after him amplifying the buffalo , They would do well to better document, not to shoot buffaloes, and to hope that I am right about the obligation that will be canceled, because otherwise we are all in tremendous danger and facing a possible terrifying project for the dark ends that it allows.

We hope that the imposition of the vaccination obligation was only a serious oversight by the government, the Parliament and the Head of State, that is, of an entire political class not adequate to govern the hyper-technological present, and we hope this “oversight” was motivated only by someone's bribes or by the need to revive the economy. Because if this is not the case then we are facing the “socialization” Human Body, and under the guise of public purpose supreme, to a new form of control of the body, to slavery, the denial of human rights and the Constitution. But still we must all be very concerned that all these issues the parliament has not even considered. Who do we have in parliament ? We are sure that this “Democracy” and is such that it functions?

And now let us ask: because Butac shot a hoax ?

In my opinion why that of “Vaccines” it has now become a religion, an ideology, which also ignores the science that shows us the harmfulness of some components of vaccines (science tons), a very powerful religion that has its more or less great martyrs, they are not people like me who do science and human rights, MA children harmed in appalling quantities by these highly dangerous products, not tested in double-blind as you should with drugs. More than confident, many are damaged and deaths produced by vaccines.

We hope that “scientists” butac and others to repent and recognize that they were blinded by……tell them what.

But unfortunately the problem remains: what aluminum do with us, mercury into tracks and the rest of the hardware present in vaccines that are intolerable for the body? Science tells us that they do badly. Want to see who ends that are not NOVAX the balls that creTVini believed? Many children are dying or are damaged because of this religion.

Mando to maicolengel@butac.it and Giornalettismo the request to publish in their post the link to my article, and that their online hoax remains as an example of “religion” blind vaccinist who underestimates the seriousness of the issues related to the obligation.