The Constitutional Court will also dissolve the knot of the Lorenzin law.

The Constitutional Court announced on 25 October that in the hearing of 21 November it will be decided not only on the Law Decree n°73 of the 2017, but also of the conversion law n° 119/2017, ie the procedures will be unified.

So there have been 2 appeals of the Veneto Region, against the Decree Law, and the other against the Law, and in both cases Venetian aggregation intervened by raising some issues not posed by the Region.

Theoretically unification is therefore a positive thing, because it brings together the two procedures that are intimately connected, and avoids the Court of discussing twice and having to justify the intervention on a decrease already fallen, finding himself regulating the repercussions on the law.

To clarify, DL had increased to 12 the number of vaccines on the basis of one alleged outbreak of measles, threatening of being parents removed their children if they do not vaccinate, and it remained in force for 60 days as per the Constitution.

The conversion law n ° 119/2017 However, he moderated the tones by eliminating the loss of parenting, with heavy fines but much less, and unfortunately leaving the prediction that the nursery children and unvaccinated nursery can be excluded from attendance if parents do not yield to abjure to seek vaccination. Be careful that children do not vaccines can attend until March 2018 If parents request an appointment at ASL, So the problem is not an ongoing epidemic, but a target to be reached on which surely pediatricians of lucrative fees. But for these earnings it has come to ghettoize and violate the rights of the child,to interfere heavily in the choices and serenity of families, forcing parents of small children actually vaccinated illegally (the Oviedo Convention) under penalty of social isolation.

The scent is that the law will lapse, which does not imply that the previous obligation of the 4 Vaccinations.

A proof is that initially the whole press saw in the no vax stupid and disinformed people,But a part began to understand that the law is subversive of human rights. Even the false idea that vaccines are safe is unmasked by the fact that it State is paying 660 damage checks vaccine occurred in the last 15 years.

Thanks to the legal action of Venetian aggregation in the Constitutional Court, it has also begun to understand the fact that if the government is authorized to introduce by force a substance in individuals, This could become the previous one to introduce the nanchip that will soon be available, and maybe it can be inserted with vaccines. a bit’ How do you try to eliminate the freedom of the web with the excuse of terrorism or pedophilia or fake news. Too bad that the question of the right “informed consent” which prevents all this could be raised from 1999 in connection with the vaccination obligation.

THE 21 November then you charge to expectations, It could be a moment of clarity between state and citizens, between State and Regions, and bio-ethics, and the Constitutional Court, If he discuss these themes, It will not be able to ignore this data that we first led to attention, as actual damages in vaccination practices. But perhaps unfortunately nothing will happen, And it will not be completely discussed, And here's why.

First of all, the Court will have to decide who can participate in the discussion. To date we have the Veneto Region that claims the autonomy of choice in a competing matter as required by the Constitution, and claim the funds to carry out the tasks assigned by the central government.

Then discussing occurred several “intervened”, first Aggregation Veneta, which is based in the Veneto region itself where the vaccination obligation results “suspended” from the 2007 , then having legitimacy and right violated, but which also placed the theme of the illegality of the vaccination obligation in the face of the ECHR standards, the danger of triggered experimentation, and more, and bioethical issues. Later with the further intervention against the law 119/2017 Venetian aggregation, I represent, has even more valued the “informed consent” expected also from EU rules, Then by placing the issue of incompatibility with the EU regulatory framework of the Lorenzin law which claims to be its execution. We also asked many other issues such as the ascertained insecurity of these vaccines due to aluminum, the cot deaths, and more. Aggregation Veneta has also raised the issue of late submission for the conversion of the decree to the Rooms.

But in the debate in the Court there are also other subjects, I think 5, that about 1 month after the Venetian aggregation action they intervened (perhaps belatedly) they too.

Beyond the rightness of the reasons of these entities and associations, The fact is that historically and with various judgments the Constitutional Court has never admitted the intervention in the Court to the entities without the legislative function, that he never allowed them to participate in issues between State and Regions. So it is to be expected that the Court will do “go out” from the debate all these associations occurred. At least, historically it has always been done like this, and an opening on this would see the Court soon invaded by the actions of each association can use in every state-regions. So this outcome is to be expected, almost.

Because Venetian aggregation is a particular and new case, in fact it is an entity that, representing the rights of national minorities of the Venetian people according to the International Treaty, is equipped with partial legislative function, And the Constitutional Court will have to evaluate this new case never presented before.

Without this assessment of the participants, The Court could simply declare the law null and nonexistent Lorenzin, Why, as it raised Aggregation Veneta, Decree Law was presented to the conversion Rooms lags behind the provisions of the Constitution, But this only if AV will remain in the procedure. Unfortunately, however, in this case the obligation to the 4 historical vaccinations, which is illegal also since 1999, And it will be necessary to start all over again, although in Veneto we will return to the “Suspension”. Moreover this option would allow the Constitutional Court to not conflict with the Government and the Parliament and the President of the Republic who “emanated” This subversive human rights law. They would save everyone's face, hiding behind a technicality, and the actual breakdown “Policy” It would be precisely Venetian aggregation which is still completely ignored by the major newspapers to date. However, we would have the immense pleasure of having saved many children with forced vaccinations even when they had shown disturbances in making them previously, because they risk the skin seriously.

For this reason, Venetian aggregation did not favor the idea of ​​going en masse in Rome the 21 November, because it is not known what the court will do, And it will certainly be very difficult that it emits sentence on the same day. But mind you that it is not said that it is a bad idea to go there, as it is not said it is good, Personally I prefer to leave the judges to judge with serenity, And in any case, could be, It will be a moment of commonality.

However Aggregation Veneta day 27 October sent to the Court the 4555 online signatures supporting the first of its actions. Thanks to all investors for having supported, those who have not signed the face that the 21 November will bring even those, and a few more surprises.