Veneto was never annexed and only militarily invaded, Friuli-Venezia Giulia and Lombardy

The officially told stories that would lead to the annexation in 1866 Veneto, of Mantua and Friuli-Venezia Giulia, but also that of Lombardy in 1859, they are false, and I demonstrate it once again with this writing.

Once upon a time there were three states, the Republic of Venice, the Duchy of Milan and the Duchy of Mantua.

Let's leave aside the alternating events of each to get straight to the question of their sovereignty.

The Republic of Venice in 1797, was invaded, or more than anything else conquered militarily and stripped of its pulp, by the troops in Napoleon's service, and unfortunately at the time international law established that whoever won the war kept the spoils, i.e. the State, the riches, and ruled the people.

It should be known that this was international law until 1840, that is, the heads of state, i Papi, the Emperors, the Kings and Doges could buy and sell territories as if they were things. For example, Venice bought Dalmatia. This system was widespread in Europe.

Given that legally the “Venetian Republic”, but rather it exists “Republic of Venice”, when Napoleon took military possession of it in 1797 he obtained the Major Council of the same in May, obtorto neck, recognized him as head of state, and that the aforementioned system of government should also be adopted “municipal”, ie Napoleonic.

Then the Maggior Consiglio dissolved itself, putting an end to centuries of aristocratic government of the Patriciate Nobles. They hoped that Napoleon would spare them and take them as good administrators, a practice also used by the Byzantines and Arabs, and in short they tried to save face and power by avoiding massacres, and instead the predator Napoleon ended up plundering, rape, kill, to plunder them too as well as terrorizing the Venetians who were shot on the spot if they shouted “W San Marco”.

There are those who say that that resolution of the Maggior Consiglio lacked the number required for such serious decisions, i.e. the quorum for the “severity”, but in reality the cannons decided. And I also believe that in reality, legally, the decision to surrender would still have fallen to the Senate, which however no longer existed.

Napoleon, according to the law of the time and as Head of State, ceded Corfu to the English, and left eight Greek Islands to themselves which declared their own Heptoionic Republic which later became and called “Greek”. This is an example that states can change names over time but remain legally the same.

With the Treaty of Campo Formio (Udine) of the 17 October 1797, Napoleon cedes the Republic of Venice to the Habsburgs after reducing it by some pieces , and this was his legal right at the time.

The Habsburgs also plundered, they killed etc, but more slowly, and then Napoleon returned again and then the Habsburgs again, but the bureaucrats rebelled with legal and administrative tricks, so in 1805 with the Wallis decree the Habsburgs restored the institutions of the Republic of Venice to date 1797, but under their representation.

In fact, it is not written anywhere that the Doge had to be Venetian, the Habsburg Emperor remained head of state, but despite being head of state of the Republic of Venice, I don't think he should be legally recognized as Doge as he probably didn't bow to San Marco to crown himself with the ducal hat.

What matters is that from then until 1866 the Head of State of the Venetian State remained the Habsburgs (but there would be discussion about 1848), and in fact at the Congress of Vienna it was represented by them .

We must be aware that monarchs still represent multiple states, still as if they were their property, although some citizens' rights have subsequently been established in international law, for example the right of self-government (1840) which consists of the right to vote for or against annexation . But it wasn't there at that time and it wasn't there yet in 1816 when the Habsburgs merged with the Republic of Venice (their properties) the Duchy of Milan (their properties) dissolving it, and the Duchy of Mantua (their properties) dissolving it.

Thus the Republic of Venice on the one hand expanded to include them, but on the other hand the Emperor decided to change the name to Lombardy-Veneto.

At the same time he created a new administrative region, Lombardy, that we don't know where he invented it because there has never been a Lombard people and it has nothing to do with Lombard history, otherwise it would be called Longobardia in defiance of the uniqueness of Pavia's architecture.
The rest of the “Veneto” remained as always including Friuli and extended up to Trieste.

In short, we must understand that Lombardy-Veneto is the legal continuation of the Republic of Venice, i.e. of the Veneto State, and Venice was its political capital.

In short, the Republic of Venice did not die in 1797, and in fact we find it at the Congress of Vienna represented by the Habsburgs as it is their legally held possession, and these in the 1816 they reworked it and changed the name to Lombardo-Veneto. The people watched and could do nothing, because they had no rights.

Those who say that the various treaties that concerned the Republic of Venice after 12 May 1797 they are not valid because it was not represented by Venetians, and the error consists in placing in that era a right of peoples that did not exist and which was recognized decades ago (1840) for annexations, and even beyond 150 years for the right to vote for their representatives.

When then in the 1859 France invaded Lombardy accompanying the King of Sardinia (savoy) which Piedmont also had, Nice and Savoy, instead of making the people vote as they should have since 1840 he had the annexation of Lombardy to the Savoys declared to the Municipality of Milan, but since Milan was without title because the Duchy had ceased in 1816, the annexation was fake and illegal.

Said even more clearly, Lombardy never voted for annexation, but this does not mean that it can become an independent state, and you have to keep reading to understand it.

The annexation of Lombardy to the Savoys without a vote was contested internationally, the Habsburgs never recognized her, and the Savoys, after robbing and looting, they took advantage of the experience and in the various other territories of Italy where they sent their henchmen to steal they had fake annexation plebiscites decided by them. As if now we decided to let Albania join the European Union but by making the law ourselves and deciding who votes without making the Albanian state law. namely, the annexations in the Kingdom of the two Sicilies are all fake.

One morning of 1861 the Kingdom of Sardinia found itself without an Official Journal anymore, since then it was published as the Official Gazette of the Kingdom of Italy, So, someone had changed her name without there being a law and without having the right to do so.

Arzillo on the millions of deaths committed to build the Kingdom of Italy, the King wanted the border in the Alps, and allies himself with Prussia against the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and when in 1866 Prussia attacks from the north , Italy tries to break through from the south to Custoza, but it was swept away by the Venetians with the Habsburg insignia. In reality there were Venetians also under other banners, as was repeated on the Piave decades later. Venetians were shooting at Venetians both under foreign uniforms.

Lost at Custoza, Italy seeks revenge and victory, and she is sure of winning at sea with her brand new steel ships, he must sink only wooden boats left to the Venetians still from the Republic of Venice, and instead loses even more sensationally in Lissa, the Austro-Venetian navy which speaks the Venetian language, even the Austrian captain, wins and shouts “W San Marco”.

For these victories, Italy will coldly serve bitter revenge to the Venetians, because luckily for him his ally, Prussia, is winning over the Austro-Hungarian Empire and is forced to leave Lombardy-Veneto legally and militarily free, but it recognizes their right to vote for annexation or independence.

In reality the Habsburgs ceded Lombardy-Veneto to France, which for some time has not given a damn about revolutionary values ​​and takes it without taking a vote. Rather, it had already done so with Nice and Savoy.

However, the Treaty of Vienna of 3 October 1866 establishes that for the possible annexation of Lombardy-Veneto by France (and not from Austria) in Italy the citizens will have to be consulted and they will have to vote freely. Signed by the Habsburg Emperor, the Emperor of France and the King of Italy who acts as a spectator who in short recognize the international status of Lombardy-Veneto as it already was when it was called the Republic of Venice.

Here is the delicate point and we need to understand some things. E’ it is false to say that Austria ceded Veneto to Italy, and also Lombardy-Veneto.
The rights of citizens of Lombardy-Veneto in the territories of 1859 it does not derive from a concession, but by the sovereignty of the Republic of Venice.
Its citizens had the right to vote for annexation regardless of whether it was written in a treaty, but in any case it was also written and explicitly recognized.

In short, it was recognized that the citizens of the entire Lombardy-Veneto region should have voted, and freely too, and only then, if they had wanted, they would have become one of the states of the King of Sardinia who in the meantime called himself King of Italy Vittorio Emanuele II when the first was from Sardinia and Enough.

But why did the whole of Lombardy-Veneto have to vote given that Lombardy had been Italian since 1859?

Not only because they had not been called to vote in 1859, but also because the treaty establishes that Lombardy-Veneto is ceded according to i
territories of the administrative border, which for the Habsburgs are those of 1858. That is, the treaty legally frees and makes the entire Lombardy-Veneto region, still including Lombardy, unto itself, and not the territory according to the military situation of 1866.

In short, you have to vote, but now Italy is done and doesn't look in the face of anyone. The Italian commissioner threatens the Venetian representatives with death, and begins to organize a fake plebiscite where Italian soldiers and minors will also vote “Italian volunteers”, slavishly following the commands of Rome. Rather, for the Kingdom it is already a done deal, so much so that they publish the voting rules for the annexation of Lombardy-Veneto in their Official Journal ! As in the hypothetical case of Albania invented earlier. Not even Putin in Dombass dared to commit such ridiculous rubbish.

But it's not over yet and there hasn't been a vote yet. We will vote on 21 E 22 October 1866, but the prefectures have already been at work for months, the police stations under control, Italian laws establish the draft, the cup, electoral registers, and they can vote in our place.

Faced with all this, it is not known whether the Venetians went to vote , It seems like no, but residents in Lombardy certainly didn't go to vote, because with fatal arrogance the Kingdom of Italy decides that Lombardy is already its own and does not have to vote! Let him never have a doubt.

A few days before the vote everything is done, the Italian Commissioner Thaon di Revel hands over the sovereignty of Lombardy-Veneto to three of his frontmen, all the others didn't feel like getting themselves killed. The international guarantor of the vote, he francese Le Beuf, he knows it's a farce, the Italian has been making fun of him for days, he learned that the voting laws are published in the Official Journal, and perhaps he knew that in all the Venetian territories there are Italian electoral posters, but not in Venice where riots against Him are staged to scare Him, that dirty representative of Napoleon III, pig like his grandfather.

Le Beuf tells his boss that everything is false, that there is no freedom to vote, but in Paris they don't want to discuss the annexations again, and the Italians also guaranteed him that they will never ask for the return of the goods stolen in Venice, which still make up a third of the Louvre today.

Napoleon III orders “It's the Italians' business, do not intervene”.

Thus the three figureheads of Savoy receive sovereignty, and without waiting for the vote they deliver it to the Italian Commissioner, who masks the falsity of everything by reinstating the same three with the provisional government, italiano, that is, they pretend to be independent and instead follow orders.

The rounds of cards with which a government ends sovereignty on behalf of others is called “puppet government”, and is prohibited by international law.

or better, what a puppet government does is not legally valid.

Everything is now done: Italian soldiers will vote with Italian minors, but they won't vote for Lombardy, and minors and Italian women.
And the Venetians who go to vote will be forced to do so with a public vote: card in the white ballot box for the yes to becoming Italian, ballot in the black ballot box for NO and to remain “under the Croatian stick”.

And if someone had also campaigned for NO, one-eyed beating and prison, even to priests.

Obviously there was a sensational event 99,99% yes, or rather alone 69 “No” against beyond 600.000 votes. Sixty-nine like …..

But we don't even wait for the result, because the ballots won't even be counted anyway, they are made up numbers, and three days before the vote the Italian flag is already hoisted in Piazza San Marco, and cold revenge begins to be served.

The Venetians are taxed for each milling of flour, sale, coffee etc, and they take away all the riches to repay the costs of the war which they have brazenly won. They become so poor that they starve and develop pellagra from malnutrition, things they hadn't remembered since 1200 years the barbarian hordes had forced them to found Venice. But this time it can't be done, we need to emigrate in search of fortune, millions are leaving, pushed by the Italian government and under the illusion that there is a paradise there, 1 million goes to Brazil, a paradise, and instead they will only find plantations reduced to unhealthy territories because they were abandoned by black slaves made free by law.

E’ ended here ? The Venetians have always been Italians ?

E’ No, I didn't put the title for nothing.

E’ a bit’ long to explain, and I have it many times, and I'll do it again shortly.

But first the summary: we are already legally freed, we are sovereign but militarily occupied, we will return free and sovereign as an independent state. And here's why.

On a social network someone asked: the Venetians can be considered a people? So they can do self-determination?

I replied to him about the following.

The Venetian people not only exist as a current social phenomenon, not only does it have a thousand-year history that can be said “indigenous” in the sense of international law, but it was legally recognized with the Italian constitutional law n.340 of 1971. This law recognized the regional statute of Veneto, Article 2 also recognized the Venetian people and their right to international self-government.

in 1999 we exercised that right by implementing the’ international self-determination recognized as a right by Italian law n.881/1977.
We also asked the Prefectures for decolonization, but they simply ignored us I think with deafening embarrassment.
Since we achieved self-determination in the province of Padua, we also spoke personally with the then Prefect of Padua, that, it is worth remembering this, he is a representative of the Italian Government.

I November, undaunted, in 2000, as a legally sovereign people, we had the first national elections in centuries (people and nation are the same concept in international law) and we elected our representatives. A magistrate in Bergamo didn't like this, because obviously we claim the territory from Bergamo to Udine, who have always been Venetian since before the Romans. On the other hand, Padova, Verona and Vicenza were part of the Republic of Venice only a few decades longer than Bergamo, Brescia, Udine etc, so if they are not Venetian, neither are all the cities of today's skimpy territory of the Veneto Region. And on the other hand, because the neighboring one is called the Friuli Region- Venezia Giulia. It is important not to confuse the internal administrative borders of a state with the thousand-year-old borders of a people .

In short, a complaint for an attack on the Constitution comes from Bergamo, life imprisonment crime, and is sent to Padua from where all the faxes to the Municipalities originated. The fax is seized, and notified the Head of the Government of the Venetian people, who was Luciano Franceschi, and the President of the Veneto People's Court, that was me, Loris Palmerini. The third person who had founded the Self-government of the Veneto people with us had ended up in prison, following the speech of the Serenissimi of 1997, and since he did not agree to falsely denounce me, instigated by the magistrate, he wrote in a letter that since he didn't frame me falsely “I slammed inside”.

It's not easy to think if you perceive the risk of life imprisonment, but since we were convinced of the legality we asked for a trial instead, precisely so that our right could be ascertained. E’ since then we have been trying to get our denied rights recognized, and we even partially succeeded, and we will succeed, but here's what happened then.

It is necessary to know that prosecuting crimes such as attacks on the Constitution is the magistrate's constitutional obligation, so they had to prosecute us if such a crime had been committed, and it certainly is to organize independent elections with your own rules and claim that you have the right to do so, but they couldn't do anything about it because we had done it by virtue of the same Italian regulations!

So, received a little’ of beatings from the Carabinieri for which there was no trial due to the witnesses, and the years passed for the investigations to be closed, the PM had no choice but to archive it, namely , all he had to do was recognize the legality of our elections.

Since the elections had also been published and publicized on TV, legally those elections have implemented, self-determined, of the legally representative Venetian institutions and complete with popular vote. Don't let anyone think of doing these things again, because this time he would end up in prison for real, and I will explain why.

So from 2000 we already have our international legal institutions, and Italy recognized it in 2002, but Italy does not respect us by violating our international law, but there's more.

in 2006, studying our annexation which occurred in 1859 (Lombardy part) E 1866 (Veneto and Friuli) I legally ascertained that it was null and void, as mentioned above, because they organized the elections, frodandole pure, and in any case without having the whole of Lombardy vote, who never voted to become Italian, in violation of the law of the time.

Also in 2006 we asked the civil judge of Venice for confirmation of these facts, presenting only the draft of my book as evidence “The Republic unborn”, published in 2007. The Judge in 2008 ruled that he could not decide on the issue but without affirming Italy's sovereignty, and obviously without being able to deny the illegality of Italy in Lombardy-Veneto that I have demonstrated. Of course he would have done it if he could.

Being there’ Italy is a state militarily occupying Lombardy-Veneto, the judge and the magistrates who depend on him cannot be impartial and independent, therefore to the Venetians, the Insubres and the Mantuans are denied the human right to such a judge.

in 2008 we then asked the Council of Europe to ascertain the Italian occupation and, displaying the sentence of Venice, we asked to recognize our right to a legal judge, that is, impartial and independent.

The proceeding to the Council of Europe was accepted, and in theory it would have led to a sentence, so we asked the Veneto Council to ask how the Region intended to prepare. The answer, unbelievable, fu che “the Region is not obliged to respect international treaties signed by the State” , incredible because it is written in the Constitution and in the Regional Statute that instead it must do so, obviously. Unfortunately there has been a lack of serious patriots to urge and shame, and it all ended there.

However, the ruling from the Council of Europe was looming, therefore with the law 212 of the 2010 Italy canceled the annexation of 1866, but only from January 1st 2013. The thing was supposed to be a joke, that the residents of Lombardy-Veneto did not get the idea of ​​no longer having to pay taxes in Rome and thus being able to have a good 5000 Euros more per person per year from the cradle to the grave. In short, the doubt had to be insinuated that legally it is not true and to make people believe that it is not binding. I remember a joke by Calderoli, one by Travaglio and others. Jokes like those in the memorial of the then commissioner of the 1866.

The fact is that since 1 January 2013 Lombardy-Veneto is no longer legally annexed to the Italian Republic, in reality it never was, it has only ever been occupied militarily, as I said, I demonstrated it in 2006.

Some say that the cancellation of the annexation of the law 212/2010 was in turn canceled pursuant to the law itself, therefore before 1 January 2013, but there is no proof of this, so it's nonsense. But if we are not yet free it is because they managed to make us believe.

But then came that blessed sentence from the Council of Europe? Unfortunately, the idiot who had representation at the Council of Europe forgot to appoint the lawyer, because he was too busy organizing a shabby Brancaleone police force together with others who were policemen, ex-policemen and their other friends and relatives. Everything ended up in the news for what it was, a handful of idiots, but obviously the press tried to attribute criminal responsibility to us, only to then have to throw everything away and make a joke when we made it known that we had already kicked out the idiots months ago from the Lombardy-Veneto institutions, and not because of the idiot police but because they had acted outside our laws to evade taxes. Like Al Capone in short.

Just to know, the Council of Europe's ruling never arrived, otherwise we would have already had the Venetian judiciary for years, Insubre and Mantua, but we will get there and whoever has to pay will pay.

Further demonstrating that the Italian State is a military occupier that does not respect international law, we lost a few more years trying to “cohabit” with Italy.

in 2016, for four miracles, through a regional law that implemented an international one as its duty, we managed to get the Venetians to recognize us (from Bergamo to Udine) the rights of a distinct nation in the territory of the Republic, what it is referred to internationally as “national minority”. Some other idiots have confused this recognition of a national minority as having defined the Venetians as part of the nation, but instead legally it meant that the Venetians are a minor nation of the State which has a different nationality, because every nation has the right to its own state except when it is not a part of the nation of another state. For example, the Tyrolese of Bolzano are a de facto national minority, and in fact they don't even pay VAT .

That Veneto Regional Law n. 28 of the 2016, I had written, in practice he recognized all the Venetian people with their different languages (Veneto, cimbro, Friulian, rogue) bilingual treatment like that of South Tyrol, but also all the benefits of the Bolzano system, therefore including the reservation of public places for those who know the local language, radio and TV in the language, double language at school and study both…. even the labels on the products are also in the Venetian language. i media, so as not to be understood, they made fun of her by talking about the “dialect at school”, and no Venetian representative said a word.

Once the law was approved, it happened that the Municipality of Bagnoli di Sotto (Padova) asked for its application, in particular compliance with the prohibition on changing the ethnic proportion of the ethnic population. In fact, the Italian Government demanded that the Mayor give administrative residence to the hundreds of immigrants who were staying in the local Cona barracks. If he had done so, the few thousand citizens of the Municipality would have finished last in the social services rankings, so the Mayor of Milan opposed it by invoking the law 28/2016 and consequently the Prefect had it emptied
the barracks .

All hell broke loose! I didn't like all of this one bit’ at the top of the Veneto, not only were they angry, but they yell at the Mayor, and I suspect that they themselves asked the government to intervene by asking the Constitutional Court to strike down the law.

The Government of Rome requested its cancellation, but there were dozens of facts that prevented it, for example the denial of the Venetian language, or the discrimination of Venetians in public affairs kept out through lower school and university scores than the rest of Italy (these are not more difficult institutions, but of institutional marginalization).

The various theses that prevented the cancellation of the law 28/2016 they were given by us to the Zaia Council and to the lawyer appointed by them to defend the law, it prof. lawyer. gfdt Bertolissi, of Friulian origin.

Unfortunately when I called the lawyer Bertolissi on the phone, after telling me to fuck off several times and even shouting, he didn't want to listen to reason. I should have the recording. For this background I was then very surprised by his almost lamb-like kindness when I accidentally met him at the station in Padua. We also pleasantly drank a coffee together, which however became disgusting when he commented on the Checco Beppe celebrations in Sappada at the time, that is, of the Habsburg Emperor Franz Joseph, suggesting that we Venetians should do it too. Worth knowing, Bertolissi appears to me to be of Friulian origin, but in any case he must have taken these ridiculous ideas of his from the anti-Venetian and Austrian faction that exists in the province of Udine. E’ In fact, it happened that despite Friuli under Venetian rule it flourished splendidly, and perhaps the only true one so far, the anti-Venetian faction that had survived was incited against the Venetians during the Habsburg rule, just as they incited the Croats.

Anyway, that was the lawyer appointed by the Zaia junta to defend the law that recognized the national rights of the State to the Venetians, It is in the 2018 the trial took place in the Constitutional Court. Police, who had to defend her, instead of indicating even one of the things we had written to him that defended it, he told the Court verbatim “this law is useless” therefore the Constitutional Court canceled it. But it did so in violation of international law itself, because as a recognized nation we had the right to be heard, and the right to state our reasons, but the Court, exactly, he denied it to us by violating it. It doesn't even appear that the Zaia council gave Bertolissi the order to highlight the discrimination we suffer. One day we will see the cards.

Communism condemned for crimes against humanity, Meanwhile, he was informed of everything, but unfortunately the employee accidentally once lost the email, another fell ill, then Italy's monitoring saw nothing, and in short the Council of Europe was silent, and is still silent. But it's a small thing if we consider that he remained silent about the Ukrainian bombing of Donbass since 2014, the Kiev government banned the Russian language because it was spoken, they said, da subumani e bombardava, and the Council of Europe never saw anything. In light of this, how to expect that the Council of Europe could say or do something about the Venetian question.

However I forgot to mention that always in the 2006 I also demonstrated that the Monarchy-Republic referendum of 1946 is invalid, is null, I won't explain it and you can read it in the “The Republic unborn”. But whatever it was, the Italian Republic committed suicide in 2014 and the following, because the Constitutional sentence n.1 of 2014 he had ascertained that the parliament had been elected with an illegal majority , but instead of sending them home, Judge Mattarella himself later had himself elected President of the Republic, election evidently invalid because it was carried out by an illegally elected parliament, but worse still, he then also approved an electoral law that was further invalid, and elected another even more illegal parliament, but also new constitutional judges, so Italy is effectively legally dead. namely, exists militarily, but it no longer has any legality in itself either, if he ever had it, and whoever represents it even in all its branches is not entitled to do so at all. E’ an asset for the public debt!

Returning to us and the Venetian people, we reclaim our original sovereignty as indigenous people, but also that of a recognized people who have self-determined their own institutions, and then the legality of our Lombardy-Veneto State which is the legal continuity of the Republic of Venice.

Who does not recognize these rights and does not recognize our institutions, not only is he a racist, but he commits an international crime: our institutions are there to stay and will forever, they cannot be canceled nor can they be annexed except by the entire population of Veneto and Lombardy-Veneto, in full self-government, it will not decide its own destiny with its own laws. He will be able to do it, but only then.

In other words, we must return to sovereignty, and then redo the vote of 1866, that is, deciding whether to stay alone or let the Savoys return. I imagine the outcome.

We are currently organizing the economic and social resources to present an international cause to free ourselves from the Italian occupation and, I add, European. We will certainly win and I'll explain why.

We will ask the Court to respect not only the self-determination of 1999, a UN legal principle, but also respect for’ territorial integrity violated by Italy in 1859. Obviously we will also highlight the crimes against humanity that Italy has committed against the Venetians, but let's leave it aside.

The Court will not be able to find us wrong because when the International Court of Justice sentences it makes jurisprudence binding for all States.
And since we will ask for respect for the principle of territorial integrity that the West accuses Putin of having violated, if they were to prove us wrong it would automatically prove Putin right. But that's not even the problem.

The principle of integrity is what practically prohibits the conquest of a country through war, it also corresponds to the right of citizens to approve or deny annexations. If the Court denies its value in practice we will return to the right of the strongest as was the case with the Napoleonic invasion of the Republic of Venice. As a result, Putin would become free to take over all of Ukraine and even the former countries of the Soviet Union, China could take Taiwan, the USA, Canada, Mexico etc, in practice it would be a world catastrophe.

The violation of the territorial integrity of our Lombardy-Veneto is a key issue for peace and the future of the world.

When we will be free again ? When people understand their rights, but I fear he will get there more out of desperation than anything else, because this occupying regime is bringing more and more misery and desperation as is its nature and practice.

etc, now we know why Veneto was never annexed, Friuli-Venezia Giulia and Lombardy, they have only been militarily invaded and are still occupied illegally.

Now a warning: what we did can no longer be done 2012 because Zaia wanted to replace the law of 1971 with a regional law which as such has no international value. However, Italian laws in our territory are not legitimate, since the days of the laws for plebiscite voting, because we have always been legally free.

But since there are clones of us around who make people believe their path is actually illegal and copied, let it be known that they do not have any legal coverage either Italian or international due to the law of 2012.
Therefore only and only in the wake of our self-determination will we return to sovereignty . But why don't those movements join us?
Because evidently they only serve to prevent us from reaching freedom quickly. Another stupid burletta.

To learn more, just click on the keywords under the title, or go up www.Lombardo-Veneto.net E www.palmerini.net

Loris Palmerini, 21/10/2023, all rights reserved, reproduction forbidden.