Busato is not telling the truth

Listening only today (29 April) Busato's interview on Radio 24 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/gwdpjcuwiegsw30/Gianluca_Busato_Radio_24_intervento_vs_Corriere.wav )

About Alexa.com and other sites, what Busato said is not true because Alexa.com doesn't work only with toolbars, but also consider other parameters such as visibility on search engines and on some social networks. Alexa is an Amazon company, Plebiscito.eu and the site was in the Amazon cloud: Alexa may not know the Amazon statistics? In any case, the Alexa statistics of several other sites have been tested and found reliable . Here's the comparison http://www.palmerini.net/blog/da-rischio-calcolato-i-primi-sospetti-sul-plebiscito-non-seri-ma-alexa-li-conferma/

In each case, the controversy on traffic would be easily denied because the Google Analytics statistics software on the plebiscite site was installed, then Google has accurate data to 100% the actual traffic on the site Plebiscito.eu Busato but obviously does not publish this data.

Regarding the affirmation of Busato that PC Word, Network World and IDG news certified data, This is also false.
Items are equal, And the author of the article is the same, and he confirmed that he had only reported the data declared by Busato, that the author had questioned, but strangely in American editorial offices the doubts that the author had put in the article have disappeared. On the other hand, the author said he was very annoyed for the exploitation of Busato ( you see http://www.palmerini.net/blog/sondaggi-e-riviste-non-certificano-il-plebiscito-di-busato/)

Surveys before and after the vote have made it clear that only the 37% about the Venetians is in favor of independence, Busato then the data can not be true

What do you call someone who mind ? It would give the your government to one that mind ?

Look The index on the plebiscite scam