If Italian health was like the Lombardy-Veneta one, would save 4,3 billion euros (circa 9000 billion lire)

Another primacy of the Venetians (Because the Lombardy Region is half Venetian)

If health in the regions were managed as in Lombardy and Veneto , would save 4,3 billion euros (circa 9000 billion lire).

Minister Sacconi says via Adnkronos “The two regions of the north have been taken for example in a simulation ” and counting in hand, It would be obtained “a saving of 4,3 billions of euros a year adopting, from one extreme to the other of the boot, The standard medium cost of the Lombard-Veneto health model. ”

We also know that , Data Eurostat, Veneto and Lombardy are the economic giant of Europe, with a pro-capita production of about twice the average of Europe.

If Lombardy and Veneto came out of the Europe Union, It would see his GDP of about the 10% !

This big giant 5 times the Bavaria contributes for about the 30% of the Italian product, with only one fifth of the population.

In the face of these data, Lombard citizens are the most penalized.

For them it is spent less than for the rest of the citizens, including those of the North like Trentino, Aosta Valley, Friuli, etc, but also Piedmontese , Tuscan.

Despite this it is said (But in my opinion it's not true) that health is at the top of quality

Sacconi's mathematical calculation shows us that if the other regions worked in healthcare such as Lombardy and Veneto they would save themselves 4,3 billion euros. And this money comes right from Lombardy and Veneto, as Eurostat tells us.

Here, therefore, that it is right to say that the citizens of Lombardy Veneto have the right to impose rules for other regions, To safeguard their right interests, especially since they spend less in addition to paying more.

We are faced with the ants plundered by the cicadas.

The citizens of Lombarod-Veneto and their administrators have the right to demand that their money will not be spent badly, and that the quality of the services in their territory is increased even beyond the quality threshold that are in other regions because if others spend badly it is their problem.

They certainly have the right to impose that each region spends the same money per capita for every citizen, Which is not with the citizens of Bolzano and Sicily practically assisting with a free salary (over 10.000 euro/year of expenditure per capita)

The fact that for every citizen of the Veneto and Lombard of spends much less than for other citizens is a demonstration of discrimination towards them, who are citizens of Serie B.

This tells us of the objective facts: The best are penalized

So what lesson we must draw?

It is simple and clear for me: There is no equality of citizens, but only citizens of Serie A who live on the products of others, and Serie B citizens subjected to exploitation , citizens who, while producing and demonstrating that he is the best in almost everything, and paying more taxes, They are also penalized with fewer resources and less services.

Which meritocracy exists in this state if the groups of better citizens are the most penalized in services?

none, Indeed, the incapable and zozzoni are rewarded following Camorristi.

If we do not want to deny these numbers there is the certainty that Lombardy-Veneto is a colony exploited by a world of parasites that surrounds it, and is sinking with the “Italian system”, governed as it is from Italian and political bureaucrats of low remedo.

It is not the individualism of the Venetians has maintained slaves: They are the first in generosity and solidarity.

And the selfishness and individualism of politicians imposed by Italy that make it helpless, just like it is done with every colony, complete with enemies disguises from friends, so that the change is traced back to the current system.

And all this overall proves to be as ethnic racism., started with the invasion of 1866, contrary you have treated. I am not interested in the outcome of the plebiscite of the 1866: The territory was already invaded and therefore the freedom was missing to carry it out: E’ INVALID.