The stories of Gabriel De Pieri: a human case

Mr. De Pieri Gabriele enrolled in the Popolo Veneto registry in 2002, and subsequently maintained direct contact with the then President of the Government, Franceschi and occasionally with me. But no one gave him prestigious roles.

At the request of the Franceschi 2005 De Pieri showed up at the feast of the Veneti in Cittadella wearing the dress “Venetian policeman”, A demo divided invented by Franceschi (only an allegory because there was no decree) and that he later claimed to have cost the thousands of euros that disappeared from the cash register.

When in 2008 the Court of Venice ruled on “ABSOLUTE FAILURE OF JURISDICTION” on the basis of the firm's work Palmerini, De Pieri is in the front row and decides to take full action in the institutions.

at the beginning 2009 in fact, De Pieri is a candidate for the second elections at the Assembly of Members (Venetian national parliament elected on the basis), He elected and participated in several voting but is unable to have another role.

A few months later (2009) participates in the elections of the province of Padua and is a candidate in the college of his country for the Venetian list for self-government, with presidential candidate Loris Palmerini. Unfortunately it receives only 9 votes, less than the list of candidates (http://elezioni.provincia.padova.it/elezioni.php?req=3&dati=1&elezione=16&comune=64 ). That is, if he kept quiet he easily got a few more votes.

But when it turns out that Quaglia (President of the Government) and Bortotto (police chief) implement systematic violations of statutes, De Pieri apparently sided with respect for the statute and legality. At the request of the same and other De Pieri 3 membership, the Assembly is called and in August of 2009 the same resolution, the radiation in the lives of themselves and followers ( http://www.statoveneto.net/assemblea/?p=37 e http://statoveneto.net/governo/ecco-alcuni-crimini-per-i-quali-lassemblea-ha-fatto-decare-quaglia/ ).

What happened was that the President of the Court had come casually and holding personal bills Quaglia and his minister Zanatta trafficked with San Marino through emails Government, mixing private business with the institutions above all at a time in which San Marino was under investigation and besieged by the Italian Guardia di Finanza. De Pieri and the rest of the assembly decreed the forfeiture according to the statute, Quail and even Bortotto for systematic violations of the same statute.
Quail and followers, expelled by statute, they also meet the day after the expulsion e “deliberate” invalidly (for the statute) that he not only remains head of government, but he is also head of the Assembly (role from which he had resigned to become head of government), and is also head of the judiciary , which is prohibited by statute.

in September 2009 the legitimate assembly, careless Quaglia and his rantings, It meets to vote on new prime minister, e Pier and run. However loses, the election was won by Palmerini when he asked what he would do if the police stopped him. De Pieri gave an answer that made everyone laugh, but that was the answer of what actually did years later. Palmerini had announced his resignation as President of the Court even before Quaglia's expulsion.

De Pieri accepts defeat, especially since he found himself having to defend himself in the Italian court against the accusation of having tried to run over a carabiniere.
Had happened 2 years before it was passed through a town with its own truck route prohibited. Stopped by a policeman known to be irascible, De Pieri refuses to submit documents, then he shows them, but if they saying goes “10,100,1000 Nassiria” . The policeman stands in front of the truck to block it from the start, but De Pieri ago to go anyway pretending to invest. denounced.

De Pieri Palmerini asked to help, and she takes him by his lawyer that Palmerini exposes the appeal he presented a year before the court of Padua, in which he asked the self-governing authorities for judgment on the basis of Italian law and as the only natural judge.

Del appeal Palmerini the newspapers had not given any news, but of the identical appeal of De Pieri the Mattino di Padova makes an issue in October (http://www.blitzquotidiano.it/cronaca-Italia/Padova-indagato-chiede-di-essere-giudicato-dal-tribunale-del-popolo-veneto-116037/ ) relaunched by different agencies (http://www.adnkronos.com/Archivio/AdnAgenzia/2009/10/06/Cronaca/PADOVA-RICUSA-IL-GIUDICE-VUOLE-CHE-SIA-VENETO_115308.php ) and sites.

De Pieri start thinking of being the chosen of fate, and intimate to Palmerini to resign as head of government. In Prato della Valle, After a morning interview of Padua organized by a friend of Palmerini (interview ever published) De Pieri claims to be recognized as new president, saying that the expelled Quaglia had to do it too. Palmerini tells him that there are statutes, that he must present himself to the Assembly if he wants and that Quaglia has been permanently expelled. De Pieri threatens and pushes.

De Pieri no longer shows up and reappears as president of the newly constituted State of Padua which is part of the Venetian Republic chaired by Quaglia (who also claims to be the president of the government and also of the judiciary and the self-governing assembly at the same time).

Unfortunately the De Pieri President of the Padua State is arrested by police and exhibits “patent” veneta (http://mattinopadova.gelocal.it/cronaca/2011/03/08/news/venetista-trattenuto-dai-carabinieri-perche-mostra-la-patente-veneta-1.1271216 ) demanding the subjugation of the policemen.

It is not known why De Pieri and Quaglia come at loggerheads, but on the other hand, Bortotto had also left Quaglia in the meantime to found a liberation movement and a registry copied by Palmerini.

However in 2011 De Pieri begins a parable of increasingly unrealistic absurdities.

He begins to say that the President of the Republic of Venice (instead of quail?), but a well-established government in 1997 (??). He claims to have had the UN recognition, and pretends that it is constituted by the deposit stamp of a request for recognition (!?).

De Pieri also understands the usefulness of a register of the Venetian people such as that created by Palmerini, and also De Pieri as already the lawyer. Selmo Verona, and then quail and then Bortotto, He began recording unsuspecting patrons. But De Pieri is the only one to say that the Registry is the first born, which was born in 1997, and then he begins to tell him that Palmerini copied throughout ( Quaglia also ventured into this). He also begins to argue that Palmerini is a secret service (it will later turn out that he had actually been spreading this slander for years). As evidence of the accusation against Palmerini, he exhibits a document from 1997 (It had probably quail and that only judges may have ) where Palmerini asked to be heard to speak of the Venetians in the process to Serenissimi. Palmerini had already justified the complaint as an attempt to be heard by the magistrates in order to assert the legal right of self-government of the Venetian people in the trial of the Serenissimi, and also to bring the question of fraud by Palmerini denounced and the ineligibility of Berlusconi to affirm that the State cannot have 2 weights and 2 measures . In order to be heard in the request Palmerini claimed to know some movements, that in reality he had nothing to do and in fact no one at that time did not know him. The magistrate has never heard of him, especially since his complaints were known and disseminated via the internet and became known news in the following years. (Palmerini's electoral fraud complaints dossier at the address http://italia.8m.com/salva/ ).

Unfortunately for De Pieri it is essential to destroy Palmerini's reputation, and so it is also invented that shortly before his death Bepin Segato would have confided horrible things to him about Palmerini, telling him to keep up far. Even these facts are unfortunately contradicted by several tests, first the fact that Segato and Palmerini had always frequented, so as to give life to “Committee for the Fine Venetian customs” to promote the new year. And also unfortunately for De Pieri in 2009 the publisher Gardin (which also he hated Palmerini) published letters from prison where he writes Segato, Unlike, that the judiciary wanted wedged Palmerini, and since Segato did not do so he suffered additional unjust imprisonment (you see http://www.palmerini.net/blog/segato-preferi-la-tortura-della-prigione-piuttosto-che-accusare-falsamente-palmerini/)

Unfortunately De Pieri has continued in his parable of fantasies coming to declare Doge of the Republic and communicating that during the night San Marco speaks to him in a dream and shows the way to restore the church “copta” from Venice. On the basis of this, he collected a series of complaints from the authorities without this having earned him recognition. However in 2012 publicly declared at the Jesolo conference that he had had the recognition of the validity of the document as he had been given a parking fine with cited his document of the “Venetian Republic” (in reality, even a bus or library card may suffice for the policeman).

The mayor of the town of De Pieri, especially following the reporting of relatives of De Pieri, expressed shock at the case, and the behavior of De Pieri, up to ask if she should order the forced hospitalization.

The small group of followers that De Pieri had collected by recycling Palmerini's material gradually fell apart as people began to investigate his hatred for Palmerini., up to leave him alone with her best friend, Pegorin, he too was already a member of the Assembly of the Veneto People founded in 1999 by Palmerini, Segato and Franceschi.

Unfortunately, this type of personality is what the regime and the media use to keep the Venetians away from their freedom (you see http://www.palmerini.net/blog/una-tecnica-di-regime-mettere-in-tv-limbecille-che-rovina-tutto-il-movimento/)