I copy from the website http://telegra.ph/La-sentenza-della-Corte-conferma-che-il-vaccino-di-Gardasil-uccide-le-persone-04-22 the translation of an article in Natural News of 5 April 2018
“The Court's ruling confirms that the Gardasil vaccine kills people … scientific evidence beyond any doubt … quindi, why this silence?
Thursday 5 April 2018 gives: Lance D Johnson
( Natural News ) May God bless the family Tarsell, who fought the US government for eight long years to validate a burden to medical test that the vaccine Gardasil killed their daughter. The daughter of 21 years of Tarsell, Christina Richelle, “She died of an arrhythmia induced by an autoimmune response” a Gardasil, an HPV vaccine that has received only a few days before his death.
The final sentence was confirmed by the Department of Health and Human Services: Merck's Gardasil vaccine causes autoimmune problems that cause sudden debilitation and / the death . If the girl had been killed by a madman with an AR-15, then there would be national titles and a march on Washington. Since this young woman was “hit” to death by a vaccine, the whole story is swept under the carpet.
No matter that the vaccine Gardasil is responsible for ending the life of 271 young women to date , second over 57.520 reports of adverse events obtained from the system for reporting vaccine adverse events . He 271 youth died during the school shooting, news coverage would be uninterrupted in support of gun bans. How about a ban on Gardasil – a real modern assault weapon?
The case of Tarsell was initially taken by the Court of Vaccines, which it is a payment system that was set up to compensate families for the damage from the vaccine. Vaccine manufacturers pay excise duty to this system for every vaccine they sell. This money (cost of labor) It is used to pay for the damage to selected families who can demonstrate that they were harmed by a vaccine. This system protects vaccine manufacturers from being sued in a real court, ensuring that vaccines will continue to be manufactured for the “good of all”.
Get more news like this without being censored : download the’ Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, laboratory test results, video, podcasts and more. Bypassing all Google unfair censorship, Facebook, YouTube e Twitter. Get daily news and videos straight from the source! Download here .
At the beginning, Master of the Court of Special Vaccines said Ms. Tarsell has not established persuasively “a proposition the basis of his statement, that Christina did not have an arrhythmia until after the first dose of the HPV vaccine.” The Special Master declared that “Without this foundation, Mrs Tarsell's statement does not hold up”. The Special Master has not evaluated the medical records provided by Tarsell. These documents showed that Christina's arrhythmia was not present until after the Gardasil vaccine. The Special Master, on the other hand, based his decision on the possibility that Christina's arrhythmia could be present before it was detected, even if his medical records were saying otherwise. Although arrhythmia was prevalent after Gardasil, the Special Master claimed that his arrhythmia was from a source “unknown”.
The Tarsell took their case directly to the Department of Health and Human Services and, after eight years of fighting, They received a sentence of 22 pages of Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. The ruling stated that the special Master's approach to case analysis “He has placed a load of excessively costly tests”.
Therefore the judge said Williams:
The signatory of the motion for review is GRANTED. The Special Master's decision refusing compensation is VACATA, and the case is REMOVED the Special Master for further proceedings consistent with this decision …
After eight years of struggle for justice, Tarsell i have finally received this judgment by the Special Master Christian J. Morgan:
The opinion and order of the Court required further consideration consistent with the legal principles articulated by the Court for the analysis of the evidence in this tragic case on a woman, Christina Tarsell, who died too young. Under the approach dictated by the Court, Ms. Tarsell entitled to compensation. The parties should anticipate that a separate damage order will be issued shortly. Pursuant to Rule Vaccine 28.1 (a), the Cabinet Office is responsible for notifying the Court of this ruling.
Now that a court has confirmed that the vaccine Gardasil kills people, where is the national media coverage? Where is the public protest?
Read Vaccines.news for more coverage of vaccine damage and the insane denial of reality by the medical center promoting the vaccine.