Regarding the appointment of Albert Gardin to the Doge “Venetian Republic” by the Great Council, (in the picture) I must make several considerations.
Meanwhile, I am sorry for Agnoletti Treviso, he wanted to do for many years the Doge, and now he won't be able to anymore, why the Load Doge formally it is for life…… I must say that Albert was the first to confide his desire, I still believe in 2000.
Then I also felt sorry for Gabriele Depieri, already self-proclaimed owner of the Government “nasionae” invented in 2010 but according to him from existing 1997, and allegedly Doge himself. I'm sorry because Depieri says S.Marco She speaks to him in a dream, and evidently he has forgotten to communicate the change of the holder of the ducal Seggio.
Then I feel sorry for Gianluca Busato, who as president of the Republic born in 2014 Ratings by computer-generated, It is now coming to terms with the Republic of 1797, never decayed according to Albert: and now what’ It is the true Republic? That the Old or New? Or that of Depieri?
And though this is a bit new Doge’ even the sorrow movements and liberation committees, which are two, and one clone of the other that
in turn, the first was also an almost clone of something else. Because now that there is a Doge appointed by the “most council”, and therefore they can no longer have the task of freeing the Venetians from Italian occupation, and even if before trying to free them, they stole their contents from the self-government of the Veneto people (as also also Depieri and partly Busato), Now these liberators grain can no longer operate but need to get to the Doge Service, anyhow, without asking anyone money.
Overall though, I'm sorry for the majority of the council 1797, which he had approved the end of the aristocratic regime, because the majority of council Gardin does not respect his law of the old Venetian Republic. Or maybe not ? Because if the Great Council had been dissolved, and only the people could restore it now, There is also a law of the Hapsburg era (but always Veneto State) of the 1805 ripristinava that the institutions of the Venetian Republic on 1797, turn back the hands of time. But to recognize it as valid in order to remake a Doge would imply recognizing the legal legitimacy of the Habsburg government, thus also what happened after. And then Doge would have been the Emperor ? A Mess!
So in the end I'm sorry for Albert, that after so many years of confused battles, It is now equal to the ridiculed Daddy of the Gnocco, while he declares himself King of matter more than the Doge of the Historical Regatta, and the Grand Council behind him who does not respect the procedures and appointments. In fact, I wonder on what basis these would be the members of the Great Council? They are noble? There is the golden book? There is a surviving descendant of the patriciate whose ancestors for all of these 2 centuries and 20 years have never done menial jobs and are getting married to other nobles?
It also admitted that for some “autopoiesi” marciana the Grand Council has risen like the Phoenix, the election respected the Doge election system established by the Venetian Republic ? Or they made a show of hands as to elementary? Because if it is not respected the procedure, the election is null and void.
What to say? To me it seems impossible in legal terms there is a Doge, but I look forward to being denied with proof of legality in accordance with the Venetian law of 1797 to bow down in front of Albert. But it is not so, as I believe, Albert then is what the Venetian Doge will be available to recognize the political representation, and it seems to me that Albert does not have its own political representation at all.
The 22 I wanted to be in Venice, but not for the election of the Doge, I wanted to make a film about the thousands of people who complained about the illegality of the annexation of 1866, which is also contrary to the idea that the Venetian Republic has never decayed. Why choose 22 September to make a Doge ? But it is also true that they had already tried by proposing to Rocchetta the “title” who has not heard of accepting.
Unfortunately the car melted down and my journey stopped in Dolo, but I wanted to be in the square where these two souls were present in contrast, because you can never be Venetian Republic decayed and at the same time invaded in Veneto 1866.
And maybe there was also some soul “policy” in the square, that is, some of those ready to demonstrate for the illegality of the annexation of the 1866, but then ready to recognize the legality of Italy to ask him for a referendum.
I believe that only by teaching Venetian history in schools will it be discovered that the Venetian Republic has never died, but he lost the war in 1797, and how was the law of time ( and it still happens today), who loses the war is always wrong in fact. No longer legally from 1840 But.
And as sure as the Venetian Republic was never legally dead, but invaded by Napoleon's horde it was plundered, raped, ripped to shreds by him and later by the new masters, It is also true that later its name was even deleted, replacing it with that of Lombardo-Veneto due to the unification of the Duchies of Milan and Mantua, and so then we were well defined first South Austrians, then Italian North, Now in the Northeast and other Croats and Albanians as well, Greeks etc..
The legal fact is that the Venetian Republic never died but changed form of government and name,and the Lombardo-Veneto is the same legal entity state, and it is the only one of which we can claim sovereignty as our own. And not “Veneto” invented after the war, but the Lombardo-Veneto of 1859, the one before the invasion of the Italians that year, and then in the rest of the Veneto region 1866 (comprising the Friuli) which was never legally annexed to Italy. And all because the Venetian Republic the same 12 May 1797 He abrogated the aristocratic regime and the greater the Board, whatever one may think of the Doge New MC.
In Venice 22 October 2016 therefore there were two contrary things taking place: those who invoke the Venetian Republic, and invent a new Doge with a Great Council that no one can legally recover, and those who invoke the illegality of the Italian presence in the Lombardo-Veneto invaded in 1866, but they found mostly at only Veneto today which is an Italian invention.
Already in this way it seems to me that the confusion among the Venetians is great, that some or all of the two actions the Venice 22 October has it wrong, and they can not combine these two souls.
If we add to these two souls who invoke a New Venetian Republic as proposed by Gianluca Busato with electronic votes are created on the computer, we see even more incompatibility , and even these can not unite in a war for the birth of a Venetian Republic as do Perruca and Bortotto of clones of clones liberation movements, because such movements need the war to be recognized.
He’ clear that there is only one way to clarify and create coherent action by the Venetians: a thought to become dominant, preponderant, determinant, and it must do sbugiardando and exposing the antics of crooks and deceptions. In fact, it is quite evident that unfortunately we will continue to struggle in a politically powerless chaos but also surrounded by scams if it is not clarified..
And serious people should get round the table and make a trial of the movements, a process to content, and decree the illegality of both.
The gruppoÃ¹ CHOOSE wanted to be this moment of clarity, but it became immediately, even before beginning, the refuge of counterfeiters who accuse the originals without even converse and discuss, with even worse than processes known Soviet invalids.
A closer look, so much confusion has been cleared up long, in the self-government of the Veneto people everything has been explained, but unfortunately the Venetian are slaves of the sirens as it was Ulysses. And the sirens, to better lie, mix material the real to us stolen, with falsehoods and scam, to extort money. I would be like Orpheus, but I fear I will have to remain connected to the mast like Ulysses.
In fact, not even the legal claim of self-government can be associated with the fake old and new republics, not even to those who recognize the Italian legality and not the frauds of 1866.
Yet the current situation is dramatic: in addition to the looting of the occupier, the Venetians also suffer from the scams of clones.
For example I wrote recently, a person who has lost tens of thousands of euro for believing in Depieri, who, pluridenunciato for fraud, embezzlement etc., He also had a fight with a group of Chioggia for hundreds of pieces of “citizenship” sold to 10 euro each. I know that at least two groups have separated from the forger and have thought of cloning him.
Similar stories I have been told of the Liberation Committee, and I am willing to give you names and surnames.
Moreover the Italian judiciary, slower than his, no clarity and makes his role even though they have been sued by their former followers. Keeping up these situations scammers (who knows) You take advantage of it pretending to be untouchable. And to make it believe they justify the situation with the fake materials of self-government, with which they have nothing.
For example, they speak of “absolute lack of jurisdiction” which applies exclusively to the self-government of the Veneto people, the sentence proves it.
Here, if you do not clear it leaves room for these phenomena of scams, robbery, or to the Doges Dumpling, what is being done is reinforcing the idea in the Venetians that there is no alternative to united Italy. Certainly no one of these scams can be an alternative.
We want to talk about it or is there still someone to disappoint before realizing the need for a public trial with equal prosecution and defense?
After written: among the various clones there is one that even declares itself to be self-government of the Veneto people, and it is guided by the unbalanced Daniele Quaglia in that 2009 it made us miss the opportunity of legal release by appealing to the Council of Europe, because Quaglia has left invalidate the proceedings (I do not know if on purpose) to play with propaganda weapons with Bortotto ended in a major survey in Treviso. And even if we threw them out of the 2009, Police Stations and Newspapers tacioino and continue to confuse the Venetian on them. You who read ask yourself why!
After written 2: I want to know from the government Serenissimo (and there are two) if they approve this Doge
After written 3: even the parties are splitting, and multiply
After written 4: so far the only action that has produced results it's this one