This is when Ivermectin works against Sars-Cov2 infection (Covid-19)

Reproduction prohibited. www.palmerini.net

If left untreated, Sars Cov2 infection can lead to Covid-19 and even death, but instead of authorizing the emergency use of drugs already available that have proved useful in the previous Sars Cov infection, the Minister of Health, Hope, gave an indication of the “Watchful waiting”, that is, not to administer any drug with the exception of tachipirina. This has been the case since the first official case in Italy.

The minister, as it is known, he is not a doctor, consequently someone will have also directed him to that effect, but this indication has proved fatal in very many cases, leaving patients untreated led to serious and life-threatening complications, tens of thousands of deaths. It turned out later, following some autopsies let's say “not recommended”, that the problem was untreated inflammation that led to numerous blood clots to which oxygen was not useful.

So already after only one month from the first case, several doctors, even basic, they began to use traditional medications to treat this infection, getting fantastic results, even on very elderly patients with several other concurrent pathologies.

Results so striking that no patient has yet to be dead after these treatments.

Obviously these doctors have exposed themselves a lot, one dead was enough to put them on trial.

After literally healing hundreds or perhaps thousands of patients, a group of doctors appealed to the Regional Administrative Court to have Speranza's resolution annulled, and they won.

However, the Minister appealed, according to some, because the existence of an alternative treatment to the vaccine leads to the loss of special authorization for the latter, as highly experimental drugs and therefore authorized only when there was no alternative cure, perhaps with a well tolerated drug, under the European directive on trials.

The hospital and primary care doctors who treated the infected used, among other, l’Ivermectina, a drug commonly used for parasitic infections.

But there is scientific evidence that Ivermectin works ? I did a quick search on Pubmed and the ClinicalTrials.gov database, and here's what I found.

A study has shown that Ivermectin also works as a preventative of Covid-19.

In fact the study “COVID-19: The Ivermectin African Enigma” pointed out that the countries participating in the African Program for the control of Oncocerchiasis (a parasite infection) record the 28% fewer deaths from Covid-19 and 8% fewer infections.

In a clinical trial conducted by Dhaka Medical College in June 2020 Ivermectina and Doxycyclina were administered to 200 infected with Covid-19 with moderate to medium symptoms, both hospitalized and treated at home, while the control group was given a placebo. The group that received the drugs showed a general improvement in clinical conditions, a reduction in healing times and the elimination of deaths. The placebo group (that is, untreated) recorded a worse picture e 3 dead.
These data were confirmed by an experiment on mice released in March 2021 for which Ivermectin reduced Sars-Cov2 infection .

In an other clinical trial of the Afyonkarahisar Health Science University (Turkey) its 60 patients, many with other pathologies already, in the ivermectin group for 5 days were registered on 33% fewer deaths over the three months of evaluation.

L’ Ospedale Eurnekian in Buenos Aires, Argentina, tested the administration on healthy subjects (preventive) of oral Ivermectin and Iota-carrageenan nasal spray to measure its toxicity , there were no adverse events. These official studies show that there are effective treatments for Sars-Cov2 infection, even when patients are treated at home, and also for severe cases.

A another interesting study demonstrates that ivermectin administration reduces hospital stay and clinical complications, thus freeing up hospital resources.

To all this it is enough to add the practice of home care implemented by the Piedmont Region and others and the falsity of the results of tampons with cycles longer than 28 (they also do 51) to understand that the disease is manageable but treatment is denied to create an emergency.

The fact that Minister Speranza disavows these realities of care demonstrates incapacity or bad faith ? Or what other interests?

I believe that denying treatment to patients is a criminal offense, and if justice does not think about it, there will inevitably be consequences of another kind.

However, let's not hide behind a finger, Hope is not alone, it is part of a government, there are the Regions that have the management of Health, and there are doctors' orders. What is happening then ? What kind of company we are?

Are approximately 25 years of systematic electoral fraud, if people are dying now it is not just Speranza's fault. Let's think about it.

Stay up to date by subscribing to the Telegram Channel “No Reset Stream” https://t.me/coronastream

Â